Comments on: MediaFunctions http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/08/21/mediafunctions/ Ponderances of a MediaWiki developer Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:25:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: robchurch http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/08/21/mediafunctions/comment-page-1/#comment-461 robchurch Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:32:32 +0000 http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/08/21/mediafunctions/#comment-461 No, not at present; as I said, it's quite basic. Standard names and formats needs to be a consideration, of course. No, not at present; as I said, it’s quite basic. Standard names and formats needs to be a consideration, of course.

]]> By: Magnus http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/08/21/mediafunctions/comment-page-1/#comment-460 Magnus Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:23:51 +0000 http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/08/21/mediafunctions/#comment-460 Damn, you beat me to it! :-) Did you add some "meta-meta-keywords"? For example, there are several different keys and formats for EXIF dates. I thought about adding a new wiki-internal keyword "_DATE" (or something) that pareses the "usual suspects" into a single format, which could then be the basis for categories etc. Pattern matching is kinda hard to do with parser functions... Magnus Damn, you beat me to it! :-)

Did you add some “meta-meta-keywords”? For example, there are several different keys and formats for EXIF dates. I thought about adding a new wiki-internal keyword “_DATE” (or something) that pareses the “usual suspects” into a single format, which could then be the basis for categories etc. Pattern matching is kinda hard to do with parser functions…

Magnus

]]>