http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/05/31/is-it-a-bird-is-it-a-plane-no-its-a-chlorofluorocarbon/ Ponderances of a MediaWiki developer Fri, 07 Aug 2009 18:25:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/05/31/is-it-a-bird-is-it-a-plane-no-its-a-chlorofluorocarbon/comment-page-1/#comment-280 robchurch Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:10:14 +0000 http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/05/31/is-it-a-bird-is-it-a-plane-no-its-a-chlorofluorocarbon/#comment-280 Not at all. In this case, the post has nothing to do with CFCs; I just wanted a catchy title. Not at all. In this case, the post has nothing to do with CFCs; I just wanted a catchy title.

]]> http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/05/31/is-it-a-bird-is-it-a-plane-no-its-a-chlorofluorocarbon/comment-page-1/#comment-277 Stephen Turner Fri, 01 Jun 2007 09:02:17 +0000 http://blog.anubite.co.uk/index.php/2007/05/31/is-it-a-bird-is-it-a-plane-no-its-a-chlorofluorocarbon/#comment-277 Is it too pedantic to point out that CFCs are implicated in the destruction of the ozone layer, not in climate change? And international agreements dealt with the problems of CFCs many years ago (although people in the southern hemisphere will be living with the effects for a few more years yet). Is it too pedantic to point out that CFCs are implicated in the destruction of the ozone layer, not in climate change? And international agreements dealt with the problems of CFCs many years ago (although people in the southern hemisphere will be living with the effects for a few more years yet).

]]>